
|
|
|
FELLOWSHIP GROUPS
– SUMMER 2002 JUN 11/13
THE BOOK OF RUTH: ‘LIFE-
IMPORTANT BACKGROUND: TO RUTH CHAPTERS 3 AND 4
GOD’S GOOD LAWS:
The OT law is often misunderstood as God’s stringent demands on his people. Rather it is to be seen as his fatherly instructions and guidance for the good and welfare of the people he has chosen in love and redeemed and made his own in a committed covenant relationship. The laws are his fatherly guidance for their protection and preservation.
In the next two weeks’ passages, we must have a clear understanding of two of those ‘good laws’ for his people’s protection, or we shall totally misconstrue what is happening. And then we will completely fail to discern the good values to be found in the actions and events of this chapter.
THE LEVIRITE LAW (‘Levir’ means brother-
THE REDEEMER LAW – God’s fatherly instructions for the ensuring that a family who fell on hard times and were forced to sell their inheritance in the Promised Land, did not permanently lose it and so have no means of support. It was the obligation of the nearest kinsman to buy back (redeem) the sold inheritance for his family members, to secure their future and rescue them from poverty. That man was called the ‘Kinsman redeemer’, the go’el.
Behind all this lies a strong sense of family solidarity – a solemn duty to care and protect one another. And underlying this is sense of love and duty to both the family, to the Lord who redeemed his people and gave them all an inheritance in the land. The law is obeyed and followed out of a love for the Lord and a love for his fellow people.
All this is the background to the events of Ruth 3 and Ruth 4.
RUTH 3: SECURING RUTH’S FUTURE
(the Levirite law should help you. And so should the following questions)
Naomi, buoyed up and given hope by the events of chapter 2, becomes proactive. The Lord’s guidance of Ruth to a Kinsman has brought hope
(How does this tie up with her attitude seen in 1.8 –13?)
Is it a selfish concern or altruistic?
How is her concern linked to the basic ingrained concerns for family obligations that lie behind the Levirite law.
3.5-
(Remember Boaz was certainly far older than Ruth, 3.10)
(How does her compliance authenticate her vow made in 1.16-
What sort of things make a woman today be called ‘noble’ or ‘worthy’ (as Ruth is said to have been, 3.11?)
3.8-
(remember, Boaz is not the next of kin and so legally was under no obligation to Ruth or Naomi.)
3.15-
Compare 1.21 and 3.16
Then talk about ‘family’ in today’s society. Do we have anything to learn? Have we lost anything? Is it possible in our very different society to follow the sort of family care and support shown as God’s OT ideal?
Are you at all challenged by the family values shown here?
|